<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ricky Carandang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/</link>
	<description>Rizal alive in every Filipino</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twin-Skies</title>
		<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Twin-Skies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalhero.com/?p=322#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Lemme see if that commenter has a reply email. 

He/She is just asking for a strongly worded rebuttal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme see if that commenter has a reply email. </p>
<p>He/She is just asking for a strongly worded rebuttal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalhero.com/?p=322#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

That letter to the editor infuriated me too. How callous and condescending could that person be to the poor? 

I&#039;m looking for the link to the original article where that letter was published. Do you happen to have it? I wanna write a commentary on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>That letter to the editor infuriated me too. How callous and condescending could that person be to the poor? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for the link to the original article where that letter was published. Do you happen to have it? I wanna write a commentary on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twin-Skies</title>
		<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Twin-Skies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalhero.com/?p=322#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the audio post red :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the audio post red <img src='http://rationalhero.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GabbyD</title>
		<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>GabbyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalhero.com/?p=322#comment-329</guid>
		<description>ricky c. said fr tried to backtrack. further fr melvin didnt answer the question directly.

without a transcript, i cant say anything about this, but fr. melvin’s position is clear in his comments here.

he (and the cbcp) says 2 things:
1) i reject the hypothetical tradeoff u pose because a legitimate pro-life candidate is also anti-corruption
2) i reject it also because i also reject the candidate that has the reverse position to ur hypothetical candidate: a candidate who is pro-life and pro-corruption.

i suspect this is why he didnt directly answer the question — its because he reject the question’s premise (and didnt want to say, i reject the hypothetical choice offered… etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ricky c. said fr tried to backtrack. further fr melvin didnt answer the question directly.</p>
<p>without a transcript, i cant say anything about this, but fr. melvin’s position is clear in his comments here.</p>
<p>he (and the cbcp) says 2 things:<br />
1) i reject the hypothetical tradeoff u pose because a legitimate pro-life candidate is also anti-corruption<br />
2) i reject it also because i also reject the candidate that has the reverse position to ur hypothetical candidate: a candidate who is pro-life and pro-corruption.</p>
<p>i suspect this is why he didnt directly answer the question — its because he reject the question’s premise (and didnt want to say, i reject the hypothetical choice offered… etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Eden</title>
		<link>http://rationalhero.com/2010/01/27/ricky-carandang/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalhero.com/?p=322#comment-328</guid>
		<description>You interviewed Ricky Carandang? That&#039;s awesome!

I&#039;m supporting Gibo Teodoro, but I don&#039;t like his current stance on RH.

I read something from the Inquirer Letters to the Editor that made my blood curdle.

---begin quote---
The rich cannot afford to have many children because more children will deprive them of time to make more and more money. Only the poor can afford to have many children because they trust that God will bless their best efforts to provide for their children.
---end quote---

When people decide not to have many children, sometimes they do it so they can assure the quality of life of their kids. When people put their trust in God to provide for them, they are being downright irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You interviewed Ricky Carandang? That&#8217;s awesome!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m supporting Gibo Teodoro, but I don&#8217;t like his current stance on RH.</p>
<p>I read something from the Inquirer Letters to the Editor that made my blood curdle.</p>
<p>&#8212;begin quote&#8212;<br />
The rich cannot afford to have many children because more children will deprive them of time to make more and more money. Only the poor can afford to have many children because they trust that God will bless their best efforts to provide for their children.<br />
&#8212;end quote&#8212;</p>
<p>When people decide not to have many children, sometimes they do it so they can assure the quality of life of their kids. When people put their trust in God to provide for them, they are being downright irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
